"Tim Peters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > g = remote_iterate(itertools.count) > > You didn't run this code, right? itertools.count() was intended.
Sorry, I made a cut-and-paste error posting the message. My test case did use itertools.count(). > In any case, as when calling any generator, nothing in the body of > remote_iterate() is executed until the generator-iterator's next() > method is invoked. Ooof, I see what happened now. My first test case was misleading and made me think that the generator immediately executed until it reached a yield statement. In fact it was the generator function (i.e. the thing that made the generator), a separate object, that printed the messages. Thanks! -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
