Roy Smith wrote:
> I noticed something interesting today. In C++, you write:
>
> try {
> throw foo;
> } catch {
> }
>
> and all three keywords are verbs, so when you describe the code, you can
> use the same English words as in the program source, "You try to execute
> some code, but it throws a foo, which is caught by the handler".
Not convincing at all, since the *explicit* throw/raise lexically inside a try
block with a catch/except clause that's *predetermined* to catch it... is the
exception rather than the rule. Normally you'd use another form of block exit.
Or is the case different in C++ by any chance ?
>
> In Python, you write:
usually, you don't write something similar to that, and neither in C++ I guess.
>
> try:
> raise foo
> except:
>
> and now you've got a mix of verbs and (I think), a preposition. You can't
> say, "You try to execute some code, but it raises a foo, which is excepted
> by the handler". It just doesn't work grammatically.
>
> Sigh.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
