Roy Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Currently there's no good duck-typing way to differentiate strings > > from other sequences. > > I suppose you could do something like: > > try: > foo.isalpha > except AttributeError: > print "foo is not a string" > > but other than proving that you don't *have* to use isinstance(), I > don't think that approach has much going for it.
Duck typing preserves one very important feature of Python: a class doesn't have to *inherit from* type 'foo' to be a *substitute for* type 'foo'. An 'isinstance' check will fail on objects that don't inherit from the string types, but do implement the interface adequately. In this example, if an object 'x' implements the behaviour you're going to use, but doesn't inherit from 'basestring', refusing it just because 'isinstance(x, basestring)' is False would be the wrong choice. -- \ "I planted some bird seed. A bird came up. Now I don't know | `\ what to feed it." -- Steven Wright | _o__) | Ben Finney -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
