On 5/17/06, Andy Sy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Uh, I should know better than to try to educate, but FYI: using the > > same argument construction and having it reach an invalid conclusion > > suffices to show that the original construction is invalid, and thus > > the original conclusion is suspect. > > > I guess this *REALLY* is how a misguided tab user exercises his 'logic': > Syntax replication (e.g. so-called 'argument construction') is enough, > semantics don't matter. > > ROTFLMAO!
My instincts were correct: it is foolhardy to attempt to educate closed minds. <twitfilter status="on"> -- # p.d. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
