Pisin Bootvong wrote: > Is this a Slippery Slope fallacious argument? > (http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?SlipperySlope) > > "if python required you to name every function then soon it will > require you to name every number, every string, every immediate result, > etc. And we know that is bad. Therefore requiring you to name your > function is bad!!!! So Python is bad!!!!"
No, it is a question about consistency. Why are functions singled out? Or is this an attempt to apply an Argumentum ad Logicam fallacy? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
