[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alex Martelli) writes:
> In my opinion (and that of several others), the best way for Python to
> grow in this regard would be to _lose_ lambda altogether, since named
> functions are preferable
Why? I find the ability to create unnamed functions on the fly
to be a significant benefit when coding in Common Lisp.
Regards,
Patrick
------------------------------------------------------------------------
S P Engineering, Inc. | The experts in large scale distributed OO
| systems design and implementation.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | (C++, Java, Common Lisp, Jini, CORBA, UML)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
