On Thursday 04 May 2006 12:57, Tim Williams wrote: > > (and why do you > > seem to think that this matters, btw ?) > > I actually think it is complete twaddle
For my part, I have to agree with you on this one. In terms of any subjective to-and-fro'ing regarding the languages themselves I did some small research projects using C# and realised I couldn't find any reason to favour it over other more suitable languages in most contexts. *As a language* it's not bad (even though python it ain't), but considering the number of hoops to be jumped through to adopt it, I'll be wanting my alpha waves parsed as I sleep into well-commented colloquial English and run by an English Language JITc with assembly-like speed before I'll consider using it over python, or php, or C++. In essence, not a big fan. >I usually refer to it as "VILE!". As in what Vile thing do I have >before me. > >Emacs all the way baby! ^IAWTP^ Couldn't agree more. -- There are 10 types of people in this world, those who understand binary, and those who don't. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
