Hi!
Thanks for the quick response!
> Although this is a bit illegal, because repr is not supposed to be used
> this way.
How illegal is it? If I document it and put it in an opensource project, will
people throw tomatoes?
/Joel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Use __repr__. Behold:
>
>
>>>>class NamedThing(object):
>
> def __init__(self, name):
> self.name = name
> def __repr__(self):
> return self.name
>
>
>>>>a = NamedThing("Delaware")
>>>>b = NamedThing("Hawaii")
>>>>d = {}
>>>>d[a] = 1
>>>>d[b] = 50
>>>>print d
>
> {Delaware: 1, Hawaii: 50}
>
>>>>d[a]
>
> 1
>
>>>>d[b]
>
> 50
>
> Although this is a bit illegal, because repr is not supposed to be used
> this way.
>
> Joel Hedlund wrote:
>
>>Hi!
>>
>>There's one thing about dictionaries and __hash__() methods that puzzle me. I
>>have a class with several data members, one of which is 'name' (a str). I
>>would
>>like to store several of these objects in a dict for quick access
>>({name:object} style). Now, I was thinking that given a list of objects I
>>might
>>do something like
>>
>>d = {}
>>for o in objects:
>> d[o] = o
>>
>>and still be able to retrieve the data like so:
>>
>>d[name]
>>
>>if I just defined a __hash__ method like so:
>>
>>def __hash__(self):
>> return self.name.__hash__()
>>
>>but this fails miserably. Feel free to laugh if you feel like it. I cooked up
>>a
>>little example with sample output below if you care to take the time.
>>
>>Code:
>>---------------------------------------------------------------
>>class NamedThing(object):
>> def __init__(self, name):
>> self.name = name
>> def __hash__(self):
>> return self.name.__hash__()
>> def __repr__(self):
>> return '<foo>'
>>name = 'moo'
>>o = NamedThing(name)
>>print "This output puzzles me:"
>>d = {}
>>d[o] = o
>>d[name] = o
>>print d
>>print
>>print "If I wrap all keys in hash() calls I'm fine:"
>>d = {}
>>d[hash(o)] = o
>>d[hash(name)] = o
>>print d
>>print
>>print "But how come the first method didn't work?"
>>---------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>Output:
>>---------------------------------------------------------------
>>This output puzzles me:
>>{'moo': <foo>, <foo>: <foo>}
>>
>>If I wrap all keys in hash() calls I'm fine:
>>{2038943316: <foo>}
>>
>>But how come the first method didn't work?
>>---------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>I'd be grateful if anyone can shed a litte light on this, or point me to some
>>docs I might have missed.
>>
>>Also:
>>Am I in fact abusing the __hash__() method? If so - what's the intended use of
>>the __hash__() method?
>>
>>Is there a better way of implementing this?
>>
>>I realise I could just write
>>
>>d[o.name] = o
>>
>>but this problem seems to pop up every now and then and I'm curious if there's
>>some neat syntactic trick that I could legally apply here.
>>
>>Thanks for your time!
>>/Joel Hedlund
>
>
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
