bruno at modulix wrote:
> TG wrote:
>> Hmm ... I'm definitely not a python wizard, but it seems to be quite a
>> special case that breaks the rules ... 
> 
> Yes and no. The primary use case for __new__ was to allow subclassing of
> immutable types. array.array is not immutable, but it's still a special
> case, in that it enforce type-based restrictions.
The alternative is to either:
     1) Allow arrays that have no type.
or  2) Allow arrays that change type.
Neither is a tasty alternative.  __new__ sets the stuff that
must be invariant (and for an array, that is the element type),
and __init__ does any further initialization (initialization
should be re-runnable).  In the case of array, filling the array
with data seems a great use of __init__.


-- 
-Scott David Daniels
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to