Edward Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alex Martelli wrote: > > At the same time, if the 14% slowdown is representative, then it's not > > true that the compiler responsible for it "optimizes as well" as the > > other; indeed, "does not optimize particularly well", under such a > > hypothesis, would be far from a "beyond BS" assertion. > > Maybe someone with access to Windows and some free time could compare > pybench compiled under msvc and mingw. The best way to test the compiler > is to eliminate all other variables.
I assume you mean "compare pybench on Python 2.4.3 compiled under" etc. Unfortunately, I suspect the ex-officio gcc defenders will only react by finding yet another quibble (anything to avoid admitting that gcc may not be as good at optimizing as a _Microsoft_ product -- perish the thought!), therefore I'm disinclined to invest my scarce free time in that particular endeavour. Alex -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list