Carl> class some_attribute:
Carl> __metaclass__ = PropertyMaker
Carl> def get(self):
Carl> whatever
Carl> def set(self,value):
Carl> whatever
Carl> But the thing is, if I did that, I'd be lying bastard.... With
Carl> the make statement, I could instead write:
Carl> make property some_attribute:
Carl> def get(self):
Carl> # etc.
Carl> Then I'm not lying about it, and I'm using a more straightforward
Carl> syntax.
I agree. For the specific example of creating properties, you could
probably dream up some other syntax, but I suspect this notion will pop up
again. Even if you comment the heck out of a lying class definition, tools
like pylint and pychecker will think you're creating a class anyway and
incorrectly apply their class heuristics to your whatever-it-is.
Skip
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
