"infidel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If you want the user to be able to (re)define them in config.py, why > not just define them there in the first place? I may be wrong, but I > think "global" means "module level" rather than "interpreter level".
That's what I'm trying to do but I'm running into problems with the function values, since they haven't been defined yet. I'm a C programmer, so I'm doing it in a bit of a C like way; prototype the function, initalize the array using the prototypes, have the functions defined somewhere else and then let the linker work it all out for me. I was hoping that python had some sort of lazy evaluation scheme for this type of behaviour so that you could defer linkage (or variable evalutation) until runtime, or at least variable reference (through the use of thunks or some sort). Maybe I was hoping for too much :) -- burton samograd kruhft .at. gmail kruhft.blogspot.com www.myspace.com/kruhft metashell.blogspot.com -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
