Ben C wrote:
> On 2006-04-11, Michele Simionato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Roy Smith wrote:
>><snip>
>>
>>>That being said, you can indeed have private data in Python. Just prefix
>>>your variable names with two underscores (i.e. __foo), and they effectively
>>>become private. Yes, you can bypass this if you really want to, but then
>>>again, you can bypass private in C++ too.
>
>
>>Wrong, _foo is a *private* name (in the sense "don't touch me!"), __foo
>>on the contrary is a *protected* name ("touch me, touch me, don't worry
>>I am protected against inheritance!").
>>This is a common misconception, I made the error myself in the past.
>
>
> Please explain! I didn't think _foo meant anything special,
It doesn't mean anything special in the language itself - it's a
convention between programmers. Just like ALL_CAPS names is a convention
for (pseudo) symbolic constants. Python relies a lot on conventions.
> __foo
> expands to _classname__foo for some sort of name-hiding.
s/hiding/mangling/
> What am I
> missing?
the __name_mangling mechanism is meant to protect some attributes to be
*accidentaly* overridden. It's useful for classes meant to be subclassed
(ie in a framework). It has nothing to do with access restriction - you
still can access such an attribute.
--
bruno desthuilliers
python -c "print '@'.join(['.'.join([w[::-1] for w in p.split('.')]) for
p in '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'.split('@')])"
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
