Georg Brandl wrote: > class C(): > > is meant to be synonymous with > > class C: > > and therefore cannot create a new-style class.
I think "looping" understands that, but is basically asking why anyone is bothering with a change that involves a part of the language that is effectively deprecated. In other words, class(): never used to be valid, so why make it valid now? -Peter -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list