Thomas Bellman wrote: > Lawrence D'Oliveiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> "const" is in C89/C90. > > Although with slightly different semantics from in C++... For > instance: > > static const int n = 5; > double a[n]; > > is valid C++, but not valid C. >
There are other differences as well. In C, I can't do something like:
int f(void)
{
return 42;
}
const int i = f()
int main()
{
return 0;
}
/David
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
