On Fri, 07 Apr 2006 16:39:40 -0700, jUrner wrote: > Maybe it was not too clear what I was trying to point out. > > I have to calculate the time time.time() requires to return the next > tick of the clock. > Should be about 0.01ms but this may differ from os to os.
I suspect that Python isn't quite fast enough to give an accurate measure for this, but I could be wrong. You can try this: def calc_time_res(): now = time.time start = now() x = start while start == x: x = now() print x - start Trying it, I get a fairly small number: >>> calc_time_res() Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in ? File "<stdin>", line 2, in calc_time_res NameError: global name 'time' is not defined >>> import time >>> >>> calc_time_res() 2.50339508057e-05 >>> calc_time_res() 2.59876251221e-05 >>> calc_time_res() 2.59876251221e-05 >>> calc_time_res() 2.59876251221e-05 >>> calc_time_res() 2.40802764893e-05 > > BTW (I'm new to linux) cat /proc/cpuinfo is nice but I have 2457.60 > bogomips. > Is this something i should be concerned about? I mean is this > contageous or something ;-) -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list