Felipe Almeida Lessa wrote: > Em Seg, 2006-04-03 às 17:20 -0700, Erik Max Francis escreveu: > >>Felipe Almeida Lessa wrote: >> >> >>>IMHO, it's strange and ugly. Besides, AFAIK everybody uses "cls" or >>>"class_", this is the first place I see "klass", so this breaks >>>consistency, too. But that's just my opinion... >> >>A quick Google Groups search indicates that `klass` is more commonly >>mentioned than `class_`. > > > Well... > > $ pwd > /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages > $ grep -re klass . | wc -l > 274 > $ grep -re class_ . | wc -l > 897 > $ calc 897 / 274 > ~3.27372262773722627737 > $ cd /tmp > $ svn co http://svn.python.org/projects/python/trunk/ > A trunk/Python > A trunk/Python/codecs.c > A trunk/Python/thread_foobar.h > ... [loads of files] ... > A trunk/pyconfig.h.in > A trunk/install-sh > U trunk > Gerado cópia de trabalho para revisão 43612. > $ grep -re klass trunk/ | wc -l > 534 > $ grep -re class_ trunk/ | wc -l > 1720 > $ calc 1720 / 534 > ~3.22097378277153558052 > $ grep -re klass trunk/Lib/ | wc -l > 340 > $ grep -re class_ trunk/Lib/ | wc -l > 1188 > $ calc 1188 / 340 > ~3.49411764705882352941 > > For me that's enough. "class_" is used at least three times more than > "klass". Besides, as Scott pointed out, "class_" is prefered by the > guidelines too.
__class__ -- Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth." -- Umberto Eco -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
