Steven D'Aprano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > While the implemented behaviour might be more practical than the > alternatives, it is still worrying paradoxical. If "All sheep are woolly", > then obviously it must also be true that "Any sheep is woolly". More > formally, if all(X), then any(X) -- except for the case of empty X. Hmmm.
Maybe "any" should be renamed to "some". -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
