"Steve R. Hastings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In the all() example, if there *are* no values in S, then none of the > values can be != 0, and IMHO all() should return False.
That goes against the usual meaning of "all" in, say, mathematical logic. Usually, "for all X in S, PRED(x) is true" means: there does not exist X in S so that PRED(x) is false. So, all(empty sequence) should be true. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
