[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Do you think this discussion is a proof that the following principle > got violated, or do you think that "loop with condition" is not such an > atomic thing to be subject to this: "There should be one -- and > preferably only one -- obvious way to do it."
Mitja's suggestion was the one obvious way. The others are all interesting, maybe even preferable in some cases, but I don't think most experienced Python programmers would be more likely to start with one of them than with the simple for-loop-with-explicit-test. -Peter -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
