In comp.lang.perl.misc Timo Stamm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Fuzzyman schrieb: >> Roedy Green wrote: >>> On 15 Mar 2006 22:20:52 -0800, "Xah Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote, >>> quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said : >>> >>>> e. For example, the in-fix >>>> notation =E2=80=9C(3+(2*5))>7=E2=80=9D is written as =E2=80=9C3 2 5 * + 7 >>>> >= >>>> =E2=80=9D, where the >>> Not that Mr. Lee has ever shown much interest in feedback, but you >>> pretty well have stick to vanilla ASCII to get your notation through >>> unmangled on newsgroups. >> Hmmm... it displays fine via google groups. Maybe it's the reader which >> is 'non-compliant' ?
> Other charsets than US-ASCII are widely accepted in non-english > newsgroups as long as the charset is properly declared. > Xah's posting was properly encoded and will display fine in every decent > newsreader. It is not just the question of the newsreader, it is also a question of whether the character set/font being used is capable of displaying the characters concerned. Axel -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
