<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This exactly what I was thinking. > > Are we wrong Alex?
Nope, you're not -- since ints aren't "immortal" (but rather limited to being reused as other ints), then, if at no _other_ place in your program do you ever need to be storing N ints at the same time, looping on an xrange of N items does reduce maximum memory needed by your program compared to looping on an equivalent range. Alex -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
