robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... > 99.99% no. I would have to use a lock everywhere, where I add or remove > something into a dict or list of the struct. Thats not the purpose of > big thread locks. Such simple operations are already atomic by the > definition of Python - and thanks to the global interpreter lock. > (Otherwise I would leave the Python language, God beware ... :-) )
You have misread the Python Language Reference -- if you can give the URL on which you have read any such promise of atomicity, I will be glad to fix the docs to make that unambiguous. There is no such promise (there may be implementation accidents in some specific implementation which happen to make some operation atomic, but NO guarantee even there that the next bugfix won't break that). Farwell and best of luck in finding other languages which support threads in a way that is more to your liking than Python -- maybe Ruby suits you, I don't know for sure though. Alex -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
