Alex Martelli wrote: > But of course, then the method's body would have to use _.one rather > than var_one, _.two rather than var_two, and _.empty_list rather than > empty_list (what a strange name -- does it STAY empty throughout the > method's execution?!). To me this looks like a small price to pay, and
empty_list name was chosen only for sake of an example. > the 'def method(_, self, ...)' signature a clear, strong indication that > something weird, but not TOO weird, is going on. YMMV... Thanks for your reply, I'll consider your suggestion. mk -- . o . >> http://joker.linuxstuff.pl << . . o It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong o o o than forgiveness for being right. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
