Andrew Gwozdziewycz wrote:
>> Knowing some details about PIL and as good as no details about
>> FreeImage, I would like in this context to become enlightened by the
>> answer to the question, when does it make sense to use FreeImage instead
>> of PIL?
>> From what I know up to now I can't see any use for FreeImage :-( .
>
> both freeimagepy and freeimage are released under the GPL, PIL is not.
>
> --
> Andrew Gwozdziewycz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> http://ihadagreatview.org
> http://plasticandroid.org
Did you read the PIL licence?
Seems to be a more free licence than GPL.
"""
A. Software License
The Python Imaging Library is:
Copyright © 1997-2003 by Secret Labs AB
Copyright © 1995-2003 by Fredrik Lundh
By obtaining, using, and/or copying this software and/or its associated
documentation, you agree that you have read, understood, and will comply
with the following terms and conditions:
Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its
associated documentation for any purpose and without fee is hereby
granted, provided that the above copyright notice appears in all copies,
and that both that copyright notice and this permission notice appear in
supporting documentation, and that the name of Secret Labs AB or the
author not be used in advertising or publicity pertaining to
distribution of the software without specific, written prior permission.
SECRET LABS AB AND THE AUTHOR DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES WITH REGARD TO
THIS SOFTWARE, INCLUDING ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND
FITNESS. IN NO EVENT SHALL SECRET LABS AB OR THE AUTHOR BE LIABLE FOR
ANY SPECIAL, INDIRECT OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER
RESULTING FROM LOSS OF USE, DATA OR PROFITS, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF
CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT OF OR IN
CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE.
"""
Uwe
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
