Brian Blais wrote:
> Colin J. Williams wrote:
>
>> Brian Blais wrote:
>>
>>> In my attempt to learn python, migrating from matlab, I have the
>>> following problem. Here is what I want to do, (with the wrong syntax):
>>>
>>> from numpy import *
>>>
>>> t=arange(0,20,.1)
>>> x=zeros(len(t),'f')
>>>
>>> idx=(t>5) # <---this produces a Boolean array,
>>> probably not what you want.
>>> tau=5
>>> x[idx]=exp(-t[idx]/tau) # <---this line is wrong (gives a TypeError)
>>>
>> What are you trying to do? It is most unlikely that you need Boolean
>> values in x[idx]
[Apologies for piggybacking.]
Boolean arrays are perfectly valid indices and do exactly what the OP wants.
In [25]: t[idx]
Out[25]:
array([ 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4, 5.5, 5.6, 5.7, 5.8, 5.9,
6. , 6.1, 6.2, 6.3, 6.4, 6.5, 6.6, 6.7, 6.8,
6.9, 7. , 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, 7.6, 7.7,
7.8, 7.9, 8. , 8.1, 8.2, 8.3, 8.4, 8.5, 8.6,
8.7, 8.8, 8.9, 9. , 9.1, 9.2, 9.3, 9.4, 9.5,
...
In [28]: (t[idx] == compress(idx, t)).all()
Out[28]: True
When used as indices, Boolean arrays are treated as arrays of Boolean values,
not 0s and 1s. Arrays of 0s and 1s used as indices would get the first and
second values of an array, respectively, as I think you were expecting.
In [35]: t[idx.astype(int)]
Out[35]:
array([ 0. , 0. , 0. , 0. , 0. , 0. , 0. , 0. , 0. , 0. , 0. ,
0. , 0. , 0. , 0. , 0. , 0. , 0. , 0. , 0. , 0. , 0. ,
0. , 0. , 0. , 0. , 0. , 0. , 0. , 0. , 0. , 0. , 0. ,
0. , 0. , 0. , 0. , 0. , 0. , 0. , 0. , 0. , 0. , 0. ,
0. , 0. , 0. , 0. , 0. , 0. , 0. , 0.1, 0.1, 0.1, 0.1,
0.1, 0.1, 0.1, 0.1, 0.1, 0.1, 0.1, 0.1, 0.1, 0.1, 0.1,
...
--
Robert Kern
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"In the fields of hell where the grass grows high
Are the graves of dreams allowed to die."
-- Richard Harter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
