Erik Max Francis wrote: > If a 4-tuple is a quadruple, a 3-tuple is a triple, a > 2-tuple is an pair, then I guess a 1-tuple would be a single. Granted > that's not nearly as gruesome enough a name to go with the special > lopsided Pythonic creature mentioned above. I suggest we name it a > hurgledink.
+1 QOTW -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list