Peter Maas wrote: > I wouldn't mind calling (1,) a simple but I'm not a native English > speaker so I have no idea wether it sounds ridiculous to English > ears. If simple is too simple for you just call it simplum or simplon > or simplex.
Heh heh, simple is weird. How about this: one-uple, which can be condensed to woople. :) -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list