In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Luis M. González <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: . . . >> Python helps you write shorter code with fewer bugs, much quicker, than C. >> If you discover a specific problem that runs too slow in Python, it is >> possible to write a C extension to solve that specific problem, while >> still having all the other advantages of Python. > >You are right, we all know that, but I think the person who asked this >question doesn't want to hear a sales pitch. He asked a very specific >question regarding execution speed. >
Also, a couple of people have written, "If you want speed, choose assembler." With full recognition of all these comments, my spe- cific response to the question regarding execution speed is, "If you want speed, Python makes a great choice. We have re-coded *from* C to Python in order to IMPROVE performance." Python-coded applications aren't always faster than corresponding C-coded ones. Sometimes they're considerably slower. Many new- comers to Python, though, underestimate how much performance they'll gain *algorithmically* by developing at the high level of Python or Erlang or ML.
-- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list