liberally snipped out parts
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 03:25:18PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Jack Diederich wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 12:50:19PM -0800, Swroteb wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I've got a reasonably sized list of objects that I'd like to pull out
> > > > > all combinations of five elements from. Right now I have a way to do
> > > > > this that's quite slow, but manageable. I know there must be a better
> > > > > way to do this, but I'm not sure what it is. Here's what I've got so
> > > > > far:
> > > >
> > > > import probstat # http://probstat.sourceforge.net
> > > > for (a, b, c) in probstat.Combination(range(9), 3): # 0..9, pick 3
> > > > print a, b, c
> > > >
>
> so I put together a little test program to see how probstat
> compares. Correspondence to my emulations is (as far as I can tell)
>
>
> def p_perm(a,n):
> A = list(a)
> t0 = time.time()
> if len(A)<n:
> c = probstat.Permutation(A,n)
> else:
> c = probstat.Permutation(A)
> print time.time()-t0
> p = []
> for i in c:
> p.append(''.join(i))
> return p
This never calls the A choose n branch because len(A) is always
bigger than n.
> print 'permutation w/o replacemment "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz":4'
> t0 = time.time()
> p = p_perm("abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz", 4)
> t1 = time.time()
> print len(p),'4-letter words',t1-t0,'seconds'
>
> Unfortunately, the long test died (out of virtual memory) executing
> the probstat.Permution test.
>
>>> import probstat
>>> p = probstat.Permutation(range(25))
>>> len(p)
2076180480
>>> p = probstat.Permutation(range(26))
>>> len(p)
-1853882368
>>>
Overflow error. I'll have to add a test that raises a ValueError
for lists that are too big.
The following simple loop takes three minutes to run on my laptop
import probstat
count_to = len(probstat(range(12))) # just computes the size
cnt = 0
while cnt < count_to:
cnt += 1
So a permutation of all arrangements of the alphabet would take
rougly forever.
-Jack
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
