If few people use file names not in their respective CP_ACP as you say, why did Microsoft bother to make Windows XP a unicode OS? It does not make any sense.
The existence of such bugs is the source of the problem itself. It is because of this situation that people in non-English speaking countries prefer to install English Windows XP. After all why should they get all messed up with incompatible software? And from my experience a considerable percent of these stay-on-the-safe-side users have their CP_ACP pages setup incorrectly. My software installs per-user Python modules in a sub-folder of the User's Application-Data folder. The software itself resides under Program-Files. The User's Application-Data folder will contain unicode characters if the User's account name contains unicode characters. You can argue that the design is good or wrong or can be altered to work around the problem, but the fact remains: Python is Broken. Martin v. Löwis wrote: > Nir Aides wrote: >> Actually, I already managed to make a Patch for this problem. >> I will post it soon on my website and in this group. >> >> But I find it strange that this problem even exists, and that I could >> not find any workarounds on the Internet. > > Very few people use file names not in their respective CP_ACP (why > do you need such filenames?), and virtually nobody wants to put such > a file name on Python's sys.path (why do you want to? - just rename > the directory and be done). > > Regards, > Martin -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list