> Still see no problem. Of course, it goes without saying that > Python 2.4 doesn't work this way, but given that it's theoretically > possible for f(a) to be resolved similarly to a.f, then I really > do not see what you're seeing here. The kwargs parameter appears > irrelevant from where I'm sitting.
Then either you didn't understand my answers, or I didn't understand your idea. Could you summarize how exactly "f(x,y=z)" should be resolved, i.e. where it should look for "f"? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
