Luiz Geron wrote: > I don't have experience on this, but I think that you can make the > script return the image "contents" directly to the img tag, without > passing it to a img file, so you can use something like this: > > <img src="script_that_return_image_contents"> > > wich saves some processing and I/O. > No it doesn't, because the script that generates the graphic is then a different script from the one that generates the referring HTML. I agree that scripted generation of the graphical content is a viable option that I overlooked, though it seems from the OP's inquiry that he already uses CGI to generate the HTML.
regards Steve -- Steve Holden +44 150 684 7255 +1 800 494 3119 Holden Web LLC www.holdenweb.com PyCon TX 2006 www.python.org/pycon/ -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
