Fredrik Lundh wrote: > Steve Holden wrote: > > >>This critique is all very well, but it tends to rely rather heavily on >>the words "I think". You are, of course, entitled to your opinion, but >>please don't think that this new design was created on a whim. > > > you keep saying that, but whenever the analysis that led up to the > suggested approach (which is broken in multiple ways) was made, it > wasn't very recently. > > what makes you so sure that what was perceived as correct among > a small group of self-selected python marketers in 2002-2003 is still > the best way to handle Python's most valuable web asset ?
We're not but they were the only people that were bothered to do anything.. If I remember, you were one of the people that had an opportunity to contribute but didn't... As for self selected, anybody was free to join and help and it was even posted to the mailing list and mentioned on numerous blogs. How about designing a website and showing us what you think would be a good idea? Or suggesting some way of managing all of the content and building the system. Or taking a screenshot of what is there and modifying it to show how you would like it changed. You are coming across has having a chip on your shoulder about something but you are not being clear exactly what it is? Tim -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
