Diez B. Roggisch wrote: >>due to the nested parentheses. Note that replacing list comprehensions >>with list(...) doesn't introduce any nested parentheses; it basically >>just replaces brackets with parentheses. > > > But you don't need the nested parentheses - use *args instead for the > list-constructor. > > list(a,b,c) > > Apart from that, I hope that the [] stay in. After all, if they are kept > around for literal list construction, the aren't free for other purposes > anyway. > >>> list(1,2,3) Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in ? TypeError: list() takes at most 1 argument (3 given) >>>
So you're talking about the way list() *should* work in Python 3, right? regards Steve -- Steve Holden +44 150 684 7255 +1 800 494 3119 Holden Web LLC www.holdenweb.com PyCon TX 2006 www.python.org/pycon/ -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
