Steven Bethard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I fully agree, but the BDFL has already (tentatively, I hope) > > Pronounced > > that the [...] form will stay in Py3K as syntax sugar for list(...). > > I find that to be a truly hateful prospect > > I'm not sure I find it truly hateful, but definitely > unnecessary. TOOWTDI and all...
Well, [...] notation for regular lists (as opposed to list comprehensions) is also unnecessary since we could use "list((a,b,c))". Are we -really- after syntax minimalism? And if we are, shouldn't we just all switch to using Scheme? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
