Michael Anthony Maibaum wrote: > Coming from the scientific community I agree. A relatively shallow > selection of standard statistical methods would be very useful to > avoid requiring people to install a relatively large external package > (e.g. scipy) for a few simple stats methods.
Gary Strangman's stats.py has existed for many years. Of course, it's utility went up quite a bit when it got integrated into scipy so that it could use efficient arrays instead of lists and had access to our library of special functions. -- Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] "In the fields of hell where the grass grows high Are the graves of dreams allowed to die." -- Richard Harter -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
