Shalabh Chaturvedi wrote: > Hm. Am I the only one not particularly impressed?
no. the design is alright (if a bit too "bland business"), but the little I've seen of the information architecture and the backend infrastructure feels like 1998 (which, I suppose, was when the project started...) on the other hand, I haven't tracked the discussions that resulted in the current architecture, so I'm probably missing something... </F> -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
