Gregory Petrosyan wrote: > Hey guys, this proposal has already been rejected (it is the PEP 204).
No, this is a subtly different proposal. Antoon is proposing *slice* literals, not *range* literals. Note that "confusion between ranges and slice syntax" was one of the reasons for rejection of `PEP 204`_. Which means that if Antoon really wants his proposal to go through, he probably needs to make sure that slice literals are clearly distinct from range literals. .. _PEP 204: http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0204.html STeVe -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
