Martin Maney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> http://beta.python.org
>> In particular, creating a good-looking design that remains readable in
>> all possible browser configurations is impossible. Getting one that is
>> readable in all reasonable browser configurations is hard, unless you
>> make your definition of "reasonable" very narrow.
> Nah, it's very simple, if you can let go of the wrong-headed notion
> that the web is just like print media.
Never had it. Gave up trying to drive it out of peoples heads over a
decade ago.
> Of course that means you're unlikely to win any design awards, or
> even get a lot of commecnts about how spiffy your web site looks,
> because all the design geeks will judge you by the inapproriate
> standards of print media.
Well, if you lower the defintion of "good-looking design" far enough,
it's simple. Those design awards don't go to sites that I consider
good-looking, though. Their standards seem to be driven by advertising
concerns, and not readability or usability.
If you ignore the designed-for-advertising goals, there's a lot of
good information about design to be had from the print media. While
some of it is totally inappropriate on the WWW (like ratios of page
dimensions), a lot of it is still applicable (like choosing coherent
font sets). If you look, you'll even find advice on how to pick fonts
for low-resolution output devices.
<mike
--
Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.mired.org/home/mwm/
Independent WWW/Perforce/FreeBSD/Unix consultant, email for more information.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
