[Bryan Olson]
> ...
> For sorting, we had the procedure 'sort', then added the pure
> function 'sorted'. We had a 'reverse' procedure, and wisely
> added the 'reversed' function.
>
> Hmmm... what we could we possible do about 'shuffle'?

'permuted' is the obvious answer, but that would leave us open to more
charges of hifalutin elitism, so the user-friendly and slightly risque
'jiggled' it is.

sorry-it-can't-be-'shuffled'-we-ran-out-of-'f's-ly y'rs  - tim
-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to