[Bryan Olson] > ... > For sorting, we had the procedure 'sort', then added the pure > function 'sorted'. We had a 'reverse' procedure, and wisely > added the 'reversed' function. > > Hmmm... what we could we possible do about 'shuffle'?
'permuted' is the obvious answer, but that would leave us open to more charges of hifalutin elitism, so the user-friendly and slightly risque 'jiggled' it is. sorry-it-can't-be-'shuffled'-we-ran-out-of-'f's-ly y'rs - tim -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
