Paul Rubin wrote: > Heiko Wundram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>Unless of course range() becomes "more clever" and returns an iterator in >>case the amount of memory to store the needed range is too large... > > That could break things. Range is supposed to return a list.
Except that we're talking about Python 3.0, which will break things anyways. -- Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] "In the fields of hell where the grass grows high Are the graves of dreams allowed to die." -- Richard Harter -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
