Terry Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As far as I am concerned "call by object" which is what you
> *did* propose implies "call by value" to anyone who is just
> learning the language, and that is the audience we're
> talking about.
>From what I can tell, Liskov proposed *three* different names for
passing references to objects: call-by-sharing, call-by-object, and
call-by-object-reference.
Call by object is the worst choice among the three, because "object"
has such a vague meaning, so you never know what implications someone
will come away with. Of the other two, I like call by object
reference, because it's clear you're passing a reference to an object,
and it doesn't really matter what an object is in this case.
<mike
--
Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.mired.org/home/mwm/
Independent WWW/Perforce/FreeBSD/Unix consultant, email for more information.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
