I think I know the answer to this, but I'll ask it just in case there's something I hadn't considered...
I'm working on a python interface to a OODB. Communication with the DB is over a TCP connection, using a model vaguely based on CORBA. I'll be creating object handles in Python which are proxies for the real objects in the database by doing something like: handle = connection.getObjectHandle (className, instanceName) Objects can have attributes (data) and operations associated with them. It would be very convenient to use the "." syntax to access both of these, i.e. be able to say: print handle.someAttribute print handle.someOperation (arg1, arg2) I'm using __getattr__() to process both of these constructs, and herein lies the rub; I need to do different things depending on whether the name is an attribute or an operation. I can ask the DB for a list of the names of all the operations supported by a given object, but that's a fairly expensive thing to do, so I'd rather avoid it if possible. It would be really nice if I had some way to find out, from inside __getattr__(), if the value I'm about to return will get called as a function (i.e., the name is followed by an open paren). I can't see any way to do that, but maybe I'm missing something? One possibility would be to use different syntaxes for attributes and operations, i.e: print handle["someAttribute"] print handle.someOperation (arg1, arg2) but I really want to avoid having to do that for a variety of reasons, not the least of which is syntax similarity with a legacy system. The best I've come up with so far is doing the expensive "get a list of operations for this class" call the first time I see an object of a given class and caching the list. The problem there is that this is a very dynamic system. It may be possible to add new operations on the fly and I don't have any good way to invalidate the cache. Any ideas? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
