Steven D'Aprano wrote: > On Mon, 26 Dec 2005 13:33:42 -0700, Tim Hochberg wrote: > >> Claudio Grondi wrote: > >>> I am currently at 39 bytes following the requirements and the principle >>> given above (my module passes the test). Anyone able to beat that? >> Wow! It'll be interesting to see how to do that. The obvious way gives >> 53 bytes. Hmmm, I'll have to see what can be done... > > OBVIOUS???
The obvious way seems to be to import the test_vectors.py file, which gives me import test_vectors as x;seven_seg=x.test_vectors.get as one possible "obvious" solution with 53 chars. But from test_vectors import*;seven_seg=test_vectors.get has only 52. And if you observe that their "test.py" file already does all the imports we want, you can get to from test import*;seven_seg=test_vectors.get with 44 chars. But I simply cant see how to get below that. And I think this is not the wanted solution at all, which is why I have no problem posting it here :-) ciao - chris -- Christian Tismer :^) <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> tismerysoft GmbH : Have a break! Take a ride on Python's Johannes-Niemeyer-Weg 9A : *Starship* http://starship.python.net/ 14109 Berlin : PGP key -> http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/ work +49 30 802 86 56 mobile +49 173 24 18 776 fax +49 30 80 90 57 05 PGP 0x57F3BF04 9064 F4E1 D754 C2FF 1619 305B C09C 5A3B 57F3 BF04 whom do you want to sponsor today? http://www.stackless.com/ -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
