like magic it did the trick :D This should be applied to future Python release. Thanks.
Fredrik Lundh wrote: > Jean-Paul Calderone wrote: > if you look at the debug output (which you may already have done), > it's an obvious case of fragmentation-inducing behaviour. any malloc- > based system may choke on the sequence > > for a large number of attempts: > allocate a 15 megabyte block > shrink block to a couple of kilobytes > occasionally allocate a medium-sized block > > from what I can tell, replacing the > > data = self.sslobj.read(size-read) > > line with > > data = self.sslobj.read(min(size-read, 16384)) > > should do the trick. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
