Gary Herron wrote: > You don't appear to understand Open Source very well. > > Python is the way it is because we, the community, *like* it that way. > It evolves in directions that we (all) decide it is to evolve. Guido is > our leader in this because we trust him and *choose* to follow his lead. > If you want something changed you don't wait and you don't whine, you > join the community with a reasoned argument for why your idea would make > it a better language in *our* eyes. > > So how about it... What's your complaint, what's your solution, and why > should we listen? > Well, this may be the CPython way of open source but I don't know if that is "Open source" in general. Another way is that if someone(or group) don't like the current state of a project, they fork. I don't know if that is possible in the context of python, and programming language in general. Can it still be called python ?
I am not saying that it is a better way(my guess is not) but just that the first sentence seems to be overly generalized. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
