"Ben Sizer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Transitivity within any single enumeration plus transivity of > equivalence across multiple enumerations, should be enough for most > needs, no?
+1 to transitivity within an enumeration. -1 to transitivity across enumerations. If they're supposed to be equivalent, why are you separating them into different enumerations at all? The whole point of an enumeration, as I see it, is to have a set of values that are only meaningfully equal or sequenced within that enumeration. -- \ "You've got the brain of a four-year-old boy, and I'll bet he | `\ was glad to get rid of it." -- Groucho Marx | _o__) | Ben Finney -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
