Terry Hancock wrote: > But that is precisely what it does mean -- Python's language > design tries to be "reasonably minimal": there's usually one > fairly easy way to do a task. Unintentionally, there may > well be a half-dozen really hard ways to do it. The point of > telling this to the potential coder is to suggest that "if > it's hard, you're probably doing it the wrong way" and nudge > them into looking at how the language designers have > intended those problems to be solved. Um, that is fine. However, what I usually see is like this :
C-programmer learning python : Hi, where is condition ? true : false someone prefer the if/else statement type: Can't you see that the following is much more readable, stupid(well not the exact word but tone in such a way like words of messy or elegant etc.) if condition: true else: false -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
