Fredrik Lundh wrote: > Peter Hansen wrote: >>Going by memory, Linux will generally be 1ms resolution (I might be >>off by 10 there...), while Windows XP has about 64 ticks per second, >>so .015625 resolution... > [snip script] > if I run this on the Windows 2K box I'm sitting at right now, it settles > at 100 for time.time, and 1789772 for time.clock. on linux, I get 100 > for time.clock instead, and 262144 for time.time.
For the record, the WinXP box I'm on is also 100 for time.time. Which is quite odd, as I have a distinct memory of us having done the above type of measurement before and having had it come out at 64. Colour me puzzled. -Peter -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
